The Risorgimento: A TRAGEDY FOR THE SOUTH torn by 1860 BY TOSCOPADANI 
magazine's "Two Sicilies" No 6 years 2009
In 2011, "celebrate" the one hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Unification of Italy, we celebrate that massacres, murders, robbery and devastation to the detriment of the South If you wanted to "celebrate" the really ' Unification of Italy, if we were all very "Italian", then you should first tell the truth about how you arrived at this unit. Instead, it already provides, will only "feast" of the infamous accomplices of all the horrendous crimes that were accomplished by the rabble and truppaglia Piedmont-Savoy. And so, "celebrating", will prove to consider the South is a colony-Tuscan Valley. As we know from the documents of the time, before the invasion of the Po Valley, the Italians were much more united: a federation of states would have been sufficient to Germany. The bankrupt finance Piedmont, however, invites Cavour Vittorio Emanuele II and rob the wealth of the other pre-unification states violating the most elementary norms of international law. To fool the losers, the small Piedmont needed to appear as the "liberator" of the Italian people, hence the Risorgimento Po unbridled propaganda that we are forced to endure for 150 years. Propaganda that today Po hypocritically pretend to renege on spitting in the plate where they are continuously carousing since 1860. The role of the mercenary
Garibaldi was then inflated to art, because the infamous "thousand" conquered the South without a fight, as he clearly understood Massimo D'Azeglio, "When you see a reign of six million and an army of 100 000 men , overcome with the loss of eight killed and 18 maimed, who wants to understand, understand. " In practice, the young King of the Two Sicilies, Francis II, animated cuddly feelings, it was easy prey to the Po-Masonic conspiracy. The South was savagely attacked, and reduced to a colony for 150 years, is constantly exploited by gangs financial Tuscan-Po.
Given the situation this way, the "Southern question" will never be resolved, because useful Northern Financial mafias. By careful analysis, it appears, without a shadow of a doubt that the South will rise again if only return to shake off parasites Po. The Italian State, in fact, to ensure that the South could reach at least the current level of the North, for years should use all its resources, with the understanding that the North should remain firm without any state aid: it will never possible.
Many are those who think that an independent South would never make it. the idea of \u200b\u200bthe South as an independent state within Europe is absolutely to be taken into account instead: Malta teaches. An independent South would regain quickly the first places in Europe, as part of the Po Valley before the invasion.
To understand everything you need to make a brief reflection on the nature of the state. Beyond the educational definitions, the state is nothing but a tool to organize the people and the territory where the people are allocated. The State, moreover, to work, should be sovereign, it must not, in its political and administrative decisions, depend neither be influenced by anyone.
People who are democratically responsible to lead the organization of the state are the politicians. They generally refer to as "right", "center" or "left", terms that in current times, however, does not mean anything. Politicians political movements are based on ideals suggestive, devised to capture the consensus of the masses, well-established symbolic myths envisage doing for centuries: patriotism, nationalism, socialism, terrorism and so on. or, by fraud, and promised future benefits ( jobs, increased income, social security, etc..) or, finally, establishing a fiscalism overwhelming with the promise of lowering the levies, often with the complicity of organized groups of voters (lobby) who, in exchange for votes, obtained improper advantage.
The essential tool for the development of all peoples, and to run the state apparatus, is money.
Money, as we know, is made with printed and metal coined. It has the function to permit the trade and pay for the work done. Currently the Euro is used, which has no intrinsic value. Its value, in fact, not based on relevant provisions of precious metal or other goods, but simply that it is accepted and exchanged by mutual agreement by all.
The amount of euros in circulation, to have credibility and effectiveness, must be in harmony with the economic situation and production (GDP, gross domestic product), otherwise it would have "inflation" (the excessive money in circulation would be devalued and would serve more money to buy the same product) or "deflation" (a little money in circulation and on lower prices, a situation that would lead to economic contraction and production resulting in unemployment).
Who then should have the responsibility for printing and minting money? It would appear that the state can not be: it, as we have seen, is the instrument of which the sovereign people have to organize their lives. So obvious that it can not be produced directly by private citizens: money has no value, because the amount put into the market would be out of control.
Money is, therefore, the cornerstone for the life of a people and its state. The state also has among its tasks is to monitor banks and to set periodically the official discount rate (ie the cost of money lent to commercial banks). In short, everything and everyone depends on money. Yet in Italy, the unit made in 1861 by the "Father of the Nation" Cavour, the state was deprived of the sovereignty issue of money, custody of a private entity, the National Bank of Piedmont (where Cavour had its interest), that is, one that - through events almost always very dirty (eg theft of reserves in gold, dollars and pounds of the Bank of Naples and Sicily during the Fascist era) - is currently the Bank of Italy. The owners of the private banks are Bank of Italy (85%), insurance (10%) and other owners children. It emphasizes: the Bank of Italy is not the state, but private. So since then it happens that the Bank of Italy, creating from scratch with only the money printing and minting, the "ideal" and then to the State, to perform its functions, is absurdly indebted ("debt") with a private . This does not happen if the State, its sovereign right and duty to print the money itself and bestow to the people, who are legal owners. An absurd so huge, so endless, that nobody can see it. A well thought out gigantic scam: it allows the shareholders of the Bank of Italy not only to enrich themselves with the "return" of debt by the state, but also to charge interest (discount rate) on money not theirs. Only that money back to the Bank's real money, why is the work and sacrifices of citizens.
But there are others that we gain from this absurd situation: those who administer the State, the politicians, who, taking advantage of their positions of power, handling the huge flow of money that the state collects taxes from citizens , are enriched indulging fabulous salaries and benefits of any kind. Moreover, they, by checking this scam of State, also carry numerous abuses, fraudulent in making concessions to their cronies, etc. to buy votes. Even at the expense of economic efficiency and administrative state. In this regard it is to remind the government of Aldo Moro in order to establish the ENEL under the pretext of "giving light to all, bought the shares of the SIP (Società Piemontese Hydro) for a sum equal to 100,000 billion lire unnecessary huge outlay, to the detriment of all, because the concessions of state-owned hydroelectric plants were about to expire and, therefore, the shares would soon lost value. That huge figure was almost taken away for decades in the development and construction of infrastructure in the South and served to finance the development of SIP technology, which passed the phone. The result of this operation: the electricity costs more in Italy than in all other European states. The operation was one of the typical scams Po, but no political party has ever gone to the bottom of the matter: no one's interest to spit in the trough where they carouse. The silence of the Southern politicians in this regard was grave, as always. Even run counter to an independent south and they rush to defend the unity, the reemergence and hail the criminal Cavour Garibaldi and the even more criminal.
With this system, since the State was deprived of sovereignty and used as a tool scam, can not be said, therefore, that in Italy there is a real state, but only its simulacrum. From this massive fraud against the people, began with the Savoy to "make a united Italy and continued with the complicity of all governments to date, we can say scientifically that the Bank of Italy (now official and member of the European Central Bank) is the real holder of power, because it appropriatasi the option to print money, shall subject political power that "does not see or hear" in order to be well bound to his crib. Suffice in this regard, remember that no politician dared, in 1992, "ask the head" of the Governor of the Bank of Italy, for having made him lose the state, that is, to all Italians, more than seventy thousand billion loss due to delay of two weeks in the devaluation of the pound - now write some for about 30% - for the benefit of international speculators. Yet this financial genius he was made Minister of the Economy (but had graduated in Arts at the Scuola Normale di Pisa), Prime Minister and President of the Republic. Of course, all the while cloaked in the "glorious revival," the unity of the country, the national anthem and waving tricolor flags and Jacobean.
With the introduction of the euro, the Bank of Italy still print paper money, but on the grant of the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, which is also private (shareholders are members of various private national banks, including that of ' England, though not into the system in Euro, however, holds 14% of the shares, and therefore profits). The granting of course involves a high charge is not justified. Against the printing cost of 0.03 cents, the ECB expects euro 2.50 per cent, of course downloaded on the Italian state, paying the final say on all of us. The European Union, is essentially a union of banks without a government supervisor. A European state, in fact, politically there. So the rulers of various European countries are now using their state as a national debt of the Central Bank, whose crib is much more abundant than the national and, moreover, less constrained by the absence of a central government for protection. Among other things, the ECB can continuously emit more money than necessary (about 5% per year), so this surplus, triggering a process of inflation, decreases the value of money. This process has the effect of a tax for the people and quietly enriched the shareholders of the ECB, because citizens and businesses - because of the creeping devaluation forced - are encouraged to ask for more money to banks, in a hellish downward spiral end.
If the ECB does not print too much Euro, there is no inflation. Inflation is caused on purpose. It is a scam so enormous that it is hard to see the contours. The fact people do not realize it, because none of the politicians talk about it. If they look good. They are interested in maintaining this system, cheat, lie shamelessly in public debates: as people adapt to the situation, believing it to be real and legitimate. All feel right to pay the "debt", and that participating in elections is a duty to choose the best politicians and parties, to "be better managed for the development of national life."
No TV is more a result of those where there is a political debate, but viewers do not realize that it's just a hoax (maybe even "combined" between opposing factions), a well-established psychological mechanism, the so-called "political theater" that captures the passions and the popular consensus, resulting in hiding behind the massive fraud concealed. The peoples of Europe are now reduced to mere sheep, more than all of South Italy, to mow as much as possible to enrich the financial groups that dominate the government. The latter, servants of banks, fees and charges increase with the deceptive pretext of inflation. Instead the opposite is true: the rise of heavy taxes is required to produce deflation (ie to decrease the amount of money in circulation that leads to higher costs). So entrepreneurs are forced to borrow money to banks, which will give more, while increasing poverty. For this, the so-called "debt" will never be erased. It is a proven mechanism that earns the ECB and politicians (Right, Left or Centre, makes no difference: all agree).
Before the arrival of the "liberators" Tuscan-Po savojardi, the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies had a completely different economy. The money was printed (Credit Guarantees) and coined by the State itself. There was a "debt" polluted by the payment of taxes in favor of a private bank. The Tour of the Two Sicilies was a State bank and its "debt" was physiological, usually due to very few taxes that will only pay for services that actually provide to the people. The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies was the third largest economy in Europe, a situation made visible by the high rent on the square in Paris.
The current system, however, is organized as follows:
a) the Italian state, without sovereignty, is used to satisfy the interests of financial groups and foreign Tuscan-Po;
b) lobby the Tuscan-Po, exploiting the South as a internal colony in which to sell their products and services. In the South, moreover, they prevent any development that could prove dangerous competitor in the North. Remember the Company of St. Paul, using the name of Banco di Napoli, sucks to pay them the savings of the South in Turin, with the shameful complicity of the political South. Another scam will be instituted "Bank of the South."
is intuitive to understand, then, that if the South return independent enough simply because they get rid of the hypocrites and parasites Tuscan-Po print their own money harmoniously in the correct amounts in order to have an immediate social and economic development, as it was before this "unification of Italy."
A classic example of this is represented by the New England colonies in North America: the settlers in the seventeenth century directly emitted its own currency, closing with the Bank of England. We had a phenomenal rise immediately, but when the British Parliament imposed in 1763 concerned the requirement to use for commercial transactions only English money printed by the private Bank of England, burdened by interest, recession, and there were now mass unemployment. It was for this reason that the outbreak of the War of American Independence and the U.S. were born. Later, however, in the new State banks, with subtle maneuvers, they resumed their dominance of "lending" money to the state and giving rise to the U.S. public debt.
Therefore, if we could free ourselves from parasitism by politicians and pseudo southern Po (old and new parties, ie those who always want a united Italy) and thus have one of our state, we achieve substantial benefits in all areas. We could build the infrastructure that we have always denied absurd pretext that lack the capital (which is like saying you can not make the streets because they lack the miles). We could produce low-cost competition from around the world. We might have a health care system among the most advanced. We have full employment without having to emigrate. In fact, the money issued directly from our state, ie, by the people, not burdened by interest payments, could be used without obstacles and stimulate the production and hence employment. Also, most importantly, there would be inflation or deflation. This is demonstrated by the Duchy duosiciliano, who maintained constant its value in 126 years of the Bourbon Kingdom.
Antonio Pagano
