Antonio Di CianoVisto the baillamme someone has sneakily unleashed against gaetana Administration in order to hit our party, but more likely to mask his own guilty conscience, we should make some clarifications on article appeared in the newspaper "La Repubblica" on Saturday 5/09/2009.I facts: Last Saturday, on page 11, the daily "La Repubblica", then also taken by the Messenger, public speculation about what the government decided to celebrate the unification of 150 'Italia.Nel long and thread-Risorgimento article the journalist (or not Ciano Raimondi journalist ... but ... without consulting anyone, and on his own ...) in the three rows of long article that concerns us ("But since we are talking about party of the South, even the nostalgia of Bourbon will be satisfied. The government's plan assumes in fact a demonstration in Gaeta, the fortress where he crushed the last stand of Francis II, as "reconciliation between Piedmont and Bourbon"), uses the term "reconciliation." Of this word used by many journalists have complained and so far so good, but even with an argument that apparently is too convoluted and that we miss logic, some have not missed an opportunity to attack Raimondi and myself .... ignoring, and we doubt their good faith, the evidence of the facts, namely that the two hypotheses on the table most likely Gaeta up for a few days before the publication of these rumors with a view of the "celebrations" of 2011 were: A) Gaeta ignored by the "celebrations" b) Gaeta still "forced" by the institutions to "celebrate" the unitàChi argues in a sectarian instrumental and evidently does not understand or pretend not to understand it better thanks to the efforts of the Administration of Gaeta in the past year and many public interventions to the many events (and on the day of one of our article was published 05/09/2009 blog has given http://partitodelsud.blogspot.com/2009/09/un-anno-di-battaglie-della-giunta.html complete list), these dangerous circumstances, that would be a slap in the face for all of us and for the 'whole South, were disinnescate.Addirittura thanks to this commitment is not about "festivities" but also remarked how manifestazione.Inoltre from our blog, perhaps for the first time, bring, however, on an equal footing in their Bourbon and Piedmont phrase "offending". remember it, who basks in "equivocation" to their own advantage, that the acts of the historic seat of the Municipal Council of Gaeta, 06/12/2008, which for almost all of these other "intriguers" keyboard has been careful not to participate, were sent to the Government, the President of the Province, the Region, the Minister Bondi ... and these, as is clear from reading the article, they gave us ragione.Ricordiamo , those who are absent, that after the above-mentioned City Council, 06/12/2008 The City Council of Gaeta sends this request to the government: "Given that 2011 marks the 150th Anniversary of the Unification of Italy, acknowledging that in Gaeta, with the fall of the fortress, ended in 1861 the historical experience of the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies, considering that there are cultural and historical reasons for believing that the City of Gaeta has suffered damages as set out in the historical context and not justifiable as evidenced in mourning ' attached report; We also believe that the Civic gathering of Gaeta in the days immediately following the fall of the fortress had to recognize as the "city had been destroyed and ruined siege and massacred by the support "with damage to the quantized time in more than two million lire in 1861 to 62 today and corresponding to more than about € 22nd, acknowledged that the city has" paid "by the immediate post- unit loyalty to the dynasty of the Bourbons with the militarization of the area and its isolation from the national context; Given that objectively the Kingdom of Sardinia has never declared war on the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies and the unification of Italy resulted in the City of Gaeta only damage and no deaths than ever, people could freely express their commitment to the Kingdom of Italy; Considered on the basis of the foregoing that the Savoy Dynasty was guilty of serious damage and casualties caused to the City of Gaeta and its population it is necessary to give a specific mandate to the city council and the mayor to institute legal action against eredisabaudi; IMPEGNA1) The Mayor and City Council, each in its competence, to enable every action useful for recognition and compensation for damage caused by the Savoy dynasty to the City of Gaeta at the siege began in November 1860 and ended in February 13, 1861, also tramiteincarico legal actions to be available in the case of heirs and beneficiaries of the heritage exreale, 2) The Mayor and City Council, each for its own jurisdiction, to request through official channels return to the town of Gaeta of all assets owned by the city-owned property in the area with the exception of sites of particular relevance to the military or strategic purposes of national security. "Specifies that in fact the first state-owned well there has been delivered to a August this year, and others will be delivered to the city by the end of October, and I also hope to recover Forte Emilio Savio, a masterpiece of engineering, but built from Piedmont, so I would really be the highest regard godimenti.Per the complaint to the Savoy, we received the report in mid-August Att. Troncone, we will decide whether or not to report them Carignano, the City Council will decide, but I I hope so, the conditions are tutte.Questo is what happened! not have to justify the bourgeois press of this state, we move on, and criticizes us back.
It seems that some who have never participated with its own symbol to electoral competition, political alliances are indefensible giving head. Or maybe the many "facts" that we were able to produce in such a short time in opposition to nothing per cubic meter produced by our detractors, who are used only to chat, that bother?
We just want to know how to present these resolutions approved Captain Fracassa of nothing ...... but probably do not even know the meaning of what is and how to make a decision.
We, as the Party of South avanti.Mentre let the Mayor of Gaeta, dott.Raimondi raised the flag on the flagpole of the Two Sicilies Port Charles III, the mayor of Pontelandolfo called the police to identify the fellow who carried the same flag. The Mayor of Gaeta, the first mayor to do so, has institutionalized the day of remembrance in the square above the door. was 13 February 2009. seems to me that the real enemy of these people is not so much Ciano, but the Party of the South, which, as a song, bomb or no bomb, it will arrive in Rome with dignity and not be sold to other considerations conclude straniero.Per that this seems too obvious, but given that there are those who pretend not to understand .. the event will certainly be present top government officials, journalists and television and of course we will also present us so that we can demonstrate, in a peaceful and democratic, display banners and flags (what we will be well organized and no one will call the police ..) , will speak about the mayor officially meridionalista Raimondi and certainly will interview Cyan, so we can launch our message that comes once in a while throughout the peninsula.
A ray of sunshine! If Gaeta had been ignored by this "event" we would not have to feel strongly and especially in an official way, as the PdSUD along with other civic lists in the city government, our reasons! The history of "reconciliation" is a "journalist of the story-telling! journalists who do not know with whom we have never spoken, and that we have entered in good faith (?) this word, we certainly did not request and never delivered. Sorry to see only that people are at work, more and different pulpits, that sticking to immediately seize the occasion to blacken commas, for "misunderstanding" and to sustain the unsustainable. What seemed so obvious, and it is so obvious, unless you are blinded by the work of meticulous disinformatia some time to carry out against us, that we have not specify these passaggi.La obvious question that now we must ask ourselves is why there is very who "equivocal" as we always did, so hard to discredit him to jump when in fact with all the effort, and we provided a detailed list, you should be proud of what you did and got the story ... hurl lies and discredit in the past has already been used several times against us and I would say the PdSUD without compare and take no presumption but only to make sure you understand the concept, even against all "we" in the last 150 years, the method is always the same ..... Open your eyes, think with your head, how long you want to be deceived? ...
by: http://napoilitania.myblog.it/
0 comments:
Post a Comment